FROM REID'S DAD

a blog for parents of teen drivers

You are currently browsing the FROM REID'S DAD weblog archives for December, 2012.

CATEGORIES

CALENDAR

December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archive for December, 2012

Teen Drivers Under Age 16

December 30, 2012

Two posts ago I commented on the overlooked statistic of teen driver injuries. Today I’d like to focus on the number of licensed teen drivers under age 16.


Here are the basic numbers, which come from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Highway Statistics Series. As of January 2010, out of about 9,800,000 licensed drivers under the age of 20, about 400,000 were under the age of 16, which is about four percent. The five leading states with drivers in this category were Florida (66,000), Michigan (55,000), Iowa (44,000), Ohio (34,000) and Kansas (33,000). I note that these statistics are coming up on three years, old, and perhaps the passage of stricter teen driver laws has reduced these numbers. Certainly the new federal transportation law will give states a financial incentive to establish 16 as their minimum licensing age if they wish to qualify for federal funds aimed at safer teen driving.


I can speculate, without having done state by state research, about why some states allow those under 16 to drive. In rural states with miles of open and lightly traveled roads, the risks to younger drivers are probably lower than they are in urbanized states with jammed highways. The necessity of a vehicle for attending school and a holding a job is no doubt another reason. Tradition, the fact that the minimum licensing law has been less than 16 for a generation, is no doubt a third reason. It is probably also the case that teen driver crashes and fatalities are just an accepted part of life in some states, the price of freedom and a mobile society. And perhaps because there are “only” 400,000 licensed drivers under age 16, their crash and fatality statistics are a blip to which few pay attention.


Yet, we should note that every bit of evidence on teen driver licensing points to the fact that if the minimum during age were based on the science of human brain development and crash and fatality data, the age would be between 22 and 25. Which is to say that, in my opinion as one who has been studying this issue in detail for five years, there really is no justification for licensing a 15 or 14 year old. This said, in states where this way-young licensing is allowed, tight, daily parent supervision is absolutely essential.


When I served in 2007-08 on a statewide task force that overhauled Connecticut’s teen driver laws, an enterprising teacher in Litchfield, Connecticut who was teaching a civics class assigned his students to write to the task force to give their views on our teen driving laws, including the minimum license age. A few students recommended that we lower the age to 14 or 13. Their impeccable reasoning was that if we allowed driving to start at 14 or 15, “by the time these drivers reach age 16, they will be experienced.” Problem solved! It appears that this thinking still holds sway in some parts of the nation.


posted by Tim | read users’ comments(0)

The funerals in Newtown prompt me today to turn from the cause of safer teen driving to what neighbors and communities can say and do to comfort bereaved parents. I draw here upon the 2,500 condolence messages that I received and the numerous acts of kindness of which I was the beneficiary in the months after my son’s death in 2006.


As noted elsewhere on this blog, I have written a memoir, His Father Still, now being considered by publishers, about my reconsideration of my son’s life and my ongoing obligations as a parent during the year after his passing. Part of my manuscript specifically considers which of those messages — handwritten, oral, and electronic — and outreach provided some solace. Though I do not know any of the Newtown families personally, as I watched and read during the past four days, it occurred to me that a subject on the minds of many, and on which I might offer something, is how to help parents deal with a catastrophe. My comments are based on a teen driver fatality, but apply generally, I think, to parents and families who have lost a child.


The first step is to recognize and accept that the despair and shock that these parents are experiencing is probably, for now, impenetrable. The starting point for comforting parents in the aftermath, unfortunately, is the reality that for weeks if not months, they will likely be inconsolable. They are currently taking the measure of their loss, trying to find a hook to arrest the sensation of falling, seeking the bottom. Suggestions or even pleas that they turn their attention to healing will be misplaced and ineffective. It will take time for them to stabilize, and only then can anything resembling healing begin.


As to actual words of condolence, the critical lesson is to send positive remembrances, not assessments or reminders of the magnitude of the loss. The saying is “Sympathize with my strength, not my weakness.” The best condolence is a happy recollection of the child who has passed away, with one previously unknown to the parent being the very best. On the other hand, condolences that say, in words or effect, “You have suffered life’s greatest loss” miss the mark. Similarly, “I can’t imagine your pain” will translate as “This is too difficult for me to think about” and so will not help. Few if any can realistically say, “I know what you are going through,” so avoid that claim. Better to just compliment the child now gone and the parent’s loving care. This is the best path to giving the parent at least a momentary lift.


When trying to comfort a bereaved parent , it’s important to consider degrees of separation and to be wary of electronic communication. Mart Twain famously said, “Where a blood relation sobs, an intimate friend should choke up, and acquaintance should sigh, and a stranger should merely fumble with his handkerchief.” Don’t sigh when you should sob, and don’t send an email when your outreach should be in person or handwritten. Condolence on a Facebook Wall or in a Tweet is risky. Emails and texts present as avoidance of face-to-face contact. Facebook posts are a very public display of what probably should be intensely private; they are communications not with the parent in pain but with the page’s audience, which misdirects and therefore dilutes the message. In addition, for those in grief, time slows down, if only because their fondest wish is to turn back the clock. Electronic messages, however, convey multi-tasking where individual, focused, thoughtful, heartfelt contemplation is essential. And needless to say (hopefully), the abbreviations, lack of grammar, and pervasive flippancy of emails and texts have no place in communicating sympathy.


Otherwise, consider these realities and opportunities that are always present in conveying sympathy: A parent’s loss may be an opportunity to repair a frayed relationship. Prompt sympathy conveys real concern, while delay is perceived as you’re being too busy to attend to what counts most. If your relationship is close enough that condolence should not be a one-off event, mark your calendar with the birthdays and anniversaries of the child and the parent, and resolve to follow up then.


If words are just not your comfort zone, don’t neglect what I came to call condolence-by-casserole. Those in shock and burdened by sorrow need to be relieved of life’s most laborious chores, such as cooking, cleaning, shopping, errands, repairs.


Finally: listen. Most people in pain actually want to talk, even if they give a contrary impression Draw them out. Ask how they are doing and, within reason, don’t take no or evasion as an answer.


Two Sundays ago, December 9th, The Compassionate Friends, the worldwide organization for parents who have lost a child, held its annual candle lighting ceremony, the world’s largest such event. As we have done for several years, we lit a candle for our son and all other children who have died, and we received messages from friends and family who had done the same. When I heard about Newtown, just days after this event, I immediately thought about the movie Forrest Gump, the scene where Forrest’s girlfriend Jenny confronts the dilapidated home where she was raised by a physically abusive father. She tries desperately to vent her anger by picking up rocks and hurling them at the house, until she collapses, realizing that she is accomplishing nothing. Tom Hanks observes, “Sometimes, there just aren’t enough rocks.” What popped into my head on Friday was, “Sometimes, there just aren’t enough candles.” We may never have enough candles for Newtown, so in this tragedy we need to look for opportunities. Among them is reflecting on how best to comfort parents who are recoiling, with words that may eventually steady them, help them find their footing, and shine a light that illuminates a path forward.


posted by Tim | read users’ comments(2)

For understandable reasons, teen driver fatalities get the lion’s share of our attention. Most traffic safety experts and advocates can probably tell you that in recent years, about 33,000 people have died annually on American roads, and that this number has included about 2,000 drivers under age 20 and about 3,000 “others ” - passengers, other drivers, pedestrians, bystanders. Injury statistics — I hesitate to use the term “non-fatal” crashes — get far less attention. For example, Allstate has carried out an “11″ campaign, focusing on the average number of teen drivers killed each day. Certainly one reason for this focus on deaths is that injury statistics are probably far less precise, and the word “injury” can cover a wide range of situations, from something requiring a few minutes of medical attention to a life-threatening impact that results in extended hospitalization. Injuries get far less notice.


So perhaps it is worth taking a moment to look at those numbers, at least as a comparison and as orders of magnitude. In round numbers, in the United States in 2009, there were approximately 11 million drivers under age 20 with learner’s permits or licenses. According to research done by the AAA Foundation, 154,000 drivers under 20 were injured, and those crashes hurt 81,000 passengers and 224,000 others (again, drivers of other vehicles, passengers in other vehicles, pedestrians and bystanders). That totals 459,000 injuries. Thus, 11 million drivers were involved in crashes that resulted in about 459,000 injuries (note that this is not to say that the teen driver caused the injuries; these numbers are what researchers call, neutrally, “crash involvements”). 459,000 injuries is an average of 1257 every day of the year.


Again, I understand the reasons for our focus on the death statistics, but maybe we would do well as safety advocates and parents to take more frequent note of the injury numbers. They are huge.


posted by Tim | read users’ comments(1)

Today, my family marks six years since Reid left us too soon. There is comfort in the fact that he has a legacy that is helping others. Thanks to so many of you who have emailed kind thoughts and prayers.


I promised a few weeks back that I would get back to the recent AAA Foundation study on teen drivers with passengers, found at http://www.aaafoundation.org/pdf/2012FatalCrashCharacteristicsTeenDriversAndPassengers.pdf. Hats off to the Foundation staff for this invaluable piece of research and insight.


I suppose that the value and impact of this report lies in the fact that even though its conclusions about teen drivers and passengers are not unexpected, the statistical evidence that it brings to the situation is national, recent, thorough, and thus indisputable. It solidifies our understanding of this intractable problem of safe teen driving, and should for years to come be the definitive source for legislators and others when they evaluate or reevaluate the passenger provisions of a teen driver law or program.


Four statistics not only popped out as I was reading but have stayed with me since. The first is ten thousand 16 and 17 year old teen driver fatalities (one of which was Reid) in the years 2005-2010. If that number does not break your heart and send a shiver up your public policy spine, I don’t know what will. Second is the gender breakdown: about two thirds of these fatalities were boys. Third, and perhaps the newest insight among the reports findings, is that while crash rates for teen drivers have declined nationally through the past several years, crash rates for teen drivers with teen passengers have stayed relatively even, demonstrating that passenger restrictions are widely ignored, even as state teen driver laws get stricter. The last statistic that caught my eye was crash rates for teens with teen passengers. We know that overall, teen driver crash rates are three to four times those of the safest drivers, and that each passenger in a teen’s car increases the crash risk. In round number, this report documents that a 16 to 17 year old driver with one or more teen passengers has a crash rate risk that is six to seven times higher than the safest category of drivers.


It is important to note that the crash risk is for teen drivers with teen passengers. When a teen has an older supervising driver in the car, crash risk does not increase, as one would expect.


Again, parents are well advised to spend time with this report, but let me pull out these pointers: (1) the passenger restriction portions of teen driver laws have solid evidence behind them: (2) don’t put your own convenience — the ease of having your teen transport passengers instead of yourself — ahead of the safety risks: (3) unfortunately, teen boys require a higher level of supervision and caution than girls; (4) since state laws on passengers vary widely but the risks are uniform, the more lenient (or non-existent) your state law is, the greater burden you have to impose passenger restrictions on your teen driver; and (5) there is no harm and in fact a likely benefit in continuing to supervise your teen as a passenger after he or she obtains a license.


Thanks again to the AAA Foundation for this valuable contribution to teen driver safety.


posted by Tim | read users’ comments(0)